The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. Attempting to introduce term into English which is not common. This has nearly an exact corollary in English (or other European) history. That of liege lord. (Note that lack of references not an issue for this nomination except one that defines it as having entered the English language!). Student7 ( talk) 22:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The topic is notable in English language scholarly usage, and the article should be kept and improved rather than being deleted. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete. Attempting to introduce term into English which is not common. This has nearly an exact corollary in English (or other European) history. That of liege lord. (Note that lack of references not an issue for this nomination except one that defines it as having entered the English language!). Student7 ( talk) 22:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The topic is notable in English language scholarly usage, and the article should be kept and improved rather than being deleted. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC) reply