The result was Delete due to lack of reliable sources to verify the existence and notability of this subject. -- RL0919 ( talk) 11:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Article purports to be about a Cryptolect from Tatar; but there are no sources (only link is dead), and I can't find any, anywhere. I'm concerned that this is actually a very subtle attack page. Furthermore, ru.wiki doesn't have an article under any of these names, which makes me even more suspicious. My feeling is that it if this is legitimate, it needs sources, and since it's been around for 3 years without them, it's time for it to go. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete due to lack of reliable sources to verify the existence and notability of this subject. -- RL0919 ( talk) 11:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Article purports to be about a Cryptolect from Tatar; but there are no sources (only link is dead), and I can't find any, anywhere. I'm concerned that this is actually a very subtle attack page. Furthermore, ru.wiki doesn't have an article under any of these names, which makes me even more suspicious. My feeling is that it if this is legitimate, it needs sources, and since it's been around for 3 years without them, it's time for it to go. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC) reply