The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Prodded by User:147.70.242.54 with the following justification: One part crystal balling, one part coatrack, and mostly something with a "cleanup" tag since 2006. Speculations, proposals, and "could be" should be discarded; parts with citations can be tucked into more appropriate articles. The future itself cannot be documented to satisfy WP:N and WP:RS, just those parts that have been contracted and/or officially announced. Deprodded by User: 70.29.210.242 with the edit comment rm PROD - longstanding article - lots of editors - rated "mid" by WPF1 - send it to AfD if you want to delete it. I tend to agree with the former as there is quite a bit of crystal balling, and the 2010 data can be easily incorporated into 2010 Formula One season. B.Wind ( talk) 20:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Prodded by User:147.70.242.54 with the following justification: One part crystal balling, one part coatrack, and mostly something with a "cleanup" tag since 2006. Speculations, proposals, and "could be" should be discarded; parts with citations can be tucked into more appropriate articles. The future itself cannot be documented to satisfy WP:N and WP:RS, just those parts that have been contracted and/or officially announced. Deprodded by User: 70.29.210.242 with the edit comment rm PROD - longstanding article - lots of editors - rated "mid" by WPF1 - send it to AfD if you want to delete it. I tend to agree with the former as there is quite a bit of crystal balling, and the 2010 data can be easily incorporated into 2010 Formula One season. B.Wind ( talk) 20:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC) reply