The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The article was split from
Stardust the Super Wizard because it made the original article too long. The stories are indivudual interpretations and explorations of the original character created in the 1930s. The stories fill in plot holes, propose backstory, and otherwise enhance a primitive, yet seminal character in comics history. They all strayed enough from the original stories and one another to deserve their own entry. Admittedly, the summary could use some polishing.
Ubiquitouslarry (
talk)
10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete or Summarize then merge: Obviously time was put into this article, but it appears to be based on
WP:SYN from
primary sources. Unless it can be demonstrated from
third-party sources that this topic has any notability, I'm skeptical that we should dedicating space to mention arbitrary projects, let alone their publication history. The crux of the notability argument is that this character is extensively used because it is in the public domain, but that claim is unsourced. Additionally, the title of the article makes it sound like it is the title of a series, but that does not appear to be the case;
Unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard comics may be more appropriate, if the article is to remain. —
Ost (
talk)
18:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete this is fancruft, a "List of unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard stories" (many of which appear to be Blogger or Tumblr posts) is better suited to
FanFiction.Net than Wikipedia.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν)
18:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The article was split from
Stardust the Super Wizard because it made the original article too long. The stories are indivudual interpretations and explorations of the original character created in the 1930s. The stories fill in plot holes, propose backstory, and otherwise enhance a primitive, yet seminal character in comics history. They all strayed enough from the original stories and one another to deserve their own entry. Admittedly, the summary could use some polishing.
Ubiquitouslarry (
talk)
10:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete or Summarize then merge: Obviously time was put into this article, but it appears to be based on
WP:SYN from
primary sources. Unless it can be demonstrated from
third-party sources that this topic has any notability, I'm skeptical that we should dedicating space to mention arbitrary projects, let alone their publication history. The crux of the notability argument is that this character is extensively used because it is in the public domain, but that claim is unsourced. Additionally, the title of the article makes it sound like it is the title of a series, but that does not appear to be the case;
Unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard comics may be more appropriate, if the article is to remain. —
Ost (
talk)
18:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete this is fancruft, a "List of unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard stories" (many of which appear to be Blogger or Tumblr posts) is better suited to
FanFiction.Net than Wikipedia.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν)
18:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.