From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stardust the Super Wizard. So Why 10:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Further Adventures of Stardust the Super Wizard

Further Adventures of Stardust the Super Wizard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List and fan cruft. Page is an extension of an article that was absurdly long before I shortened it. Don't see why this needs its own article. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 00:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 00:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 04:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 04:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Comment: The above user is the creator of both Stardust pages. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 17:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Summarize then merge: Obviously time was put into this article, but it appears to be based on WP:SYN from primary sources. Unless it can be demonstrated from third-party sources that this topic has any notability, I'm skeptical that we should dedicating space to mention arbitrary projects, let alone their publication history. The crux of the notability argument is that this character is extensively used because it is in the public domain, but that claim is unsourced. Additionally, the title of the article makes it sound like it is the title of a series, but that does not appear to be the case; Unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard comics may be more appropriate, if the article is to remain. — Ost ( talk) 18:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this is fancruft, a "List of unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard stories" (many of which appear to be Blogger or Tumblr posts) is better suited to FanFiction.Net than Wikipedia. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 18:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per power~enwiki. This simply isn't encyclopedic content. ansh 666 08:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stardust the Super Wizard. So Why 10:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Further Adventures of Stardust the Super Wizard

Further Adventures of Stardust the Super Wizard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List and fan cruft. Page is an extension of an article that was absurdly long before I shortened it. Don't see why this needs its own article. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 00:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 00:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 04:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 04:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Comment: The above user is the creator of both Stardust pages. Etzedek24 ( I'll talk at ya) ( Check my track record) 17:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Summarize then merge: Obviously time was put into this article, but it appears to be based on WP:SYN from primary sources. Unless it can be demonstrated from third-party sources that this topic has any notability, I'm skeptical that we should dedicating space to mention arbitrary projects, let alone their publication history. The crux of the notability argument is that this character is extensively used because it is in the public domain, but that claim is unsourced. Additionally, the title of the article makes it sound like it is the title of a series, but that does not appear to be the case; Unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard comics may be more appropriate, if the article is to remain. — Ost ( talk) 18:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this is fancruft, a "List of unofficial Stardust the Super Wizard stories" (many of which appear to be Blogger or Tumblr posts) is better suited to FanFiction.Net than Wikipedia. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 18:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per power~enwiki. This simply isn't encyclopedic content. ansh 666 08:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook