 | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2018 April 28. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Funds of knowledge
- Funds of knowledge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, I've tempted to call it WP:FRINGE. Natureium ( talk) 20:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete Agreed, the subject seems more fitting as a subsection in an education article; the content needs to be relocated or removed. Scriblerian1 ( talk) 21:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 01:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2018 April 28. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 06:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Funds of knowledge
- Funds of knowledge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, I've tempted to call it WP:FRINGE. Natureium ( talk) 20:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete Agreed, the subject seems more fitting as a subsection in an education article; the content needs to be relocated or removed. Scriblerian1 ( talk) 21:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 01:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.