The result of the debate was Redirect to
Strong atheism. There seems to be some usage of this term, but mainly in humourous web pages. Any further attempts to recreate the previous content, however, should be reverted immediately. --
D
e
ath
phoenix
16:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete, upon further discussion. -- D e ath phoenix 17:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC) reply
I would say this is a neologism. It gets 354 unique Google hits although a significant proportion of those argue that it is a contradiction in terms. The page as it stands reads as a POV criticism of Atheism and I suspect it would always do so. I nearly speedied this under CSD A6 but given that it makes a serious case thought it should be brought here. David | Talk 19:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Redirect to
Strong atheism. There seems to be some usage of this term, but mainly in humourous web pages. Any further attempts to recreate the previous content, however, should be reverted immediately. --
D
e
ath
phoenix
16:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete, upon further discussion. -- D e ath phoenix 17:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC) reply
I would say this is a neologism. It gets 354 unique Google hits although a significant proportion of those argue that it is a contradiction in terms. The page as it stands reads as a POV criticism of Atheism and I suspect it would always do so. I nearly speedied this under CSD A6 but given that it makes a serious case thought it should be brought here. David | Talk 19:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) reply