The result was keep. There is a general consensus that there should be some article at this title. What that article should contain (whether a disambiguation page or something else) is a discussion for the article's talk page, not AfD. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article was deprodded without explanation, so as someone who endorsed deletion I'm copying the prod here and pinging the original nominator.
Article that begins with "In mathematics" and does does not contain any mathematics except trivia. Most of the content consists of philosophical considerations that do not seem to be supported by the numerous philosophical sources. In summary, pure original research. D.Lazard (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC) (proposed by @ D.Lazard:)
Seconding, this is amateur pseudophilosophy which appears to be trying to derive an original theory of metaphysics. - car chasm (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Additionally I will add that in my experience the term "functional decomposition" seems to be used very broadly in technical contexts, to the extent that its appearance in reliable sources is no indication that an article can be written on it. WP:NOTDICT, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR. - car chasm ( talk) 16:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
19:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A first relist to allow new RS to be discussed.
Aszx5000 (
talk)
11:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aszx5000 (
talk)
11:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a general consensus that there should be some article at this title. What that article should contain (whether a disambiguation page or something else) is a discussion for the article's talk page, not AfD. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article was deprodded without explanation, so as someone who endorsed deletion I'm copying the prod here and pinging the original nominator.
Article that begins with "In mathematics" and does does not contain any mathematics except trivia. Most of the content consists of philosophical considerations that do not seem to be supported by the numerous philosophical sources. In summary, pure original research. D.Lazard (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC) (proposed by @ D.Lazard:)
Seconding, this is amateur pseudophilosophy which appears to be trying to derive an original theory of metaphysics. - car chasm (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Additionally I will add that in my experience the term "functional decomposition" seems to be used very broadly in technical contexts, to the extent that its appearance in reliable sources is no indication that an article can be written on it. WP:NOTDICT, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR. - car chasm ( talk) 16:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
19:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A first relist to allow new RS to be discussed.
Aszx5000 (
talk)
11:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aszx5000 (
talk)
11:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)