The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 ^Talk 23:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Fukah

Fukah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN per WP:GEOLAND. This is apparently unpopulated despite the claim in the article and the map - this source seems to indicate there isn't anything within 3 km of the location. MSJapan ( talk) 09:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

That source, when you zoom in, indicates a town exactly where it says there is one.-- Oakshade ( talk) 16:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes, but GEOLAND has exceptions for census tracts and suchlike wrt legal recognition, where if it's not recognized, it's not presumed keepable. As I am unsure of that, I've asked for some assistance to try to figure it out. Just FYI, at the point we're at now, it's going to be a no consensus keep. MSJapan ( talk) 18:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Per GEOLAND, probably as just "Keep." -- Oakshade ( talk) 23:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Looks like a real population center to me. Even has its own train station. A g-map search in just the Latin characters, which was all that was needed in this case, is quicker than starting an AfD. -- Oakshade ( talk) 03:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• That's what I did in the first place, but I only used the map mode - I figured it would show something more than what it did. [1] may not be RS, but it says it has only 154 people, and I can't find anything on its legal recognition as required by WP:GEOLAND (which excludes maps for purposes of notability, by the way). I also got more hits for "Fouka" vs. "Fukah", so I think it's a transliteration problem. I'll keep looking, but I'm not at the point where I see this as withdrawable yet. MSJapan ( talk) 04:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Why not? It's a populated legally recognizable place. Your full rationale was that it's "apparently unpopulated[sic]" and that a map source "seems to indicate there isn't anything within 3 km of the location." Both have been proven to be wrong. Why is this AfD still going? -- Oakshade ( talk) 04:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Again, WP:GEOLAND excludes maps aside from WP:V, so I need a bit of time to go through this new stuff and see what I get. I'm not sure of the RS on what I did find yet. MSJapan ( talk) 05:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

So despite your entire deletion rationale being wrong, you're keeping this AfD going because you refuse to believe the satellite imagery (which is not a map, by the way) showing this is a distinct population center is real? -- Oakshade ( talk) 05:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

There's a distinction between WP:V and WP:N. MSJapan ( talk) 06:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

So which is the rationale for keeping this AfD going now? Do you feel the existence of this town is not verified (WP:V) or do you feel it's not notable (WP:N)? -- Oakshade ( talk) 06:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Sorry, thought it was clear that it is V and is not N. I thought I was going to find something when I saw an article on a Fouka Bridge in Mersa Matrouh, but the village isn't mentioned, and apparently there's Fouka Bay, as well. I've got to dig more, but since I can't figure out if it's a census tract or not, I'm still on the fence on this. At the very least, it's not at the right title. MSJapan ( talk) 06:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

It seems sufficient that the Egyptian government put a post office there. Google gives the phone number as +20 46 4350026; perhaps someone should call them to see if it's really there </sarcasm> Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 23:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I can check, but you're going to have to wait until I get the requisite international phone card, oh, and learn Arabic. Can you wait that long, or should I trust your judgment? :) MSJapan ( talk) 23:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

So now you're keeping this AfD going because you think there's a conspiracy of all satellite operators, Egypt Post [2] and all map makers to make this population center up? -- Oakshade ( talk) 02:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep real place, now apparently verified is notable per WP:GEOLAND; I suggest the nom withdraw it since the nomination statement is obviously false. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 23:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
• Withdrawn - meets the guidelines, but it will need a rename to Fouka. MSJapan ( talk) 03:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.