From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  Talk 01:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Fu Yan Jie

Fu Yan Jie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this article many years ago, back in 2008. Looking in hindsight, this article is 100% non-notable, unverifiable and unencyclopedic. Furthermore, this article has zero reliable sources. Back then, my knowledge of Wikipedia policy was much more limited compared to today. Hence, I am requesting deletion, speedily if possible. -- benlisquare TCE 17:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete While it is not speedyable under any criteria I can think of, I agree with benlisquare's assessment, and so support conventional deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  Talk 01:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Fu Yan Jie

Fu Yan Jie (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this article many years ago, back in 2008. Looking in hindsight, this article is 100% non-notable, unverifiable and unencyclopedic. Furthermore, this article has zero reliable sources. Back then, my knowledge of Wikipedia policy was much more limited compared to today. Hence, I am requesting deletion, speedily if possible. -- benlisquare TCE 17:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Delete While it is not speedyable under any criteria I can think of, I agree with benlisquare's assessment, and so support conventional deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook