- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frommbach ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of a whole run of stubby articles on watercourses in Germany. Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is a minor stream with no claim to notability. The German text is longer but consists almost entirely of infobox and a text description of the course of this creek which surely sprang fully formed out of the head of the WP writer as Athena was born from the head of Zeus. I do not accept the assertion that merely naming the feature on a map constitutes meaningful notability, and I can find precious little other mention. And while I'm at it: this article along with its many kin styles this a "river". the very name belies that: bach connotes a stream or brook or other minor flow, and the picture suggests the same. Mangoe ( talk) 20:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Merge (and redirect) all of these small rivers into either Felchbach or even further into Swabian Rezat. The many standalone articles are overkill, but they are better than not covering these bodies of water at all, so I oppose outright deletion. (Ideally I'd like to see a list that contains the coordinates, which are the most useful piece of information on these substubs) — Kusma ( t· c) 09:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Geography-related deletion discussions.
Coolabahapple (
talk)
02:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- There's a LOT of German river short stubs, a lot of them are really only streams. I have no objection to redirecting the entirely of the stubs created into a rabled list which conveys the same info. Very few people on here are actively working on German geography.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Opinions vary on whether to retain the data, and there has not been enough discussion to make a determination on consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frommbach ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of a whole run of stubby articles on watercourses in Germany. Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is a minor stream with no claim to notability. The German text is longer but consists almost entirely of infobox and a text description of the course of this creek which surely sprang fully formed out of the head of the WP writer as Athena was born from the head of Zeus. I do not accept the assertion that merely naming the feature on a map constitutes meaningful notability, and I can find precious little other mention. And while I'm at it: this article along with its many kin styles this a "river". the very name belies that: bach connotes a stream or brook or other minor flow, and the picture suggests the same. Mangoe ( talk) 20:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Merge (and redirect) all of these small rivers into either Felchbach or even further into Swabian Rezat. The many standalone articles are overkill, but they are better than not covering these bodies of water at all, so I oppose outright deletion. (Ideally I'd like to see a list that contains the coordinates, which are the most useful piece of information on these substubs) — Kusma ( t· c) 09:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Geography-related deletion discussions.
Coolabahapple (
talk)
02:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- There's a LOT of German river short stubs, a lot of them are really only streams. I have no objection to redirecting the entirely of the stubs created into a rabled list which conveys the same info. Very few people on here are actively working on German geography.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Opinions vary on whether to retain the data, and there has not been enough discussion to make a determination on consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.