- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom with no delete !votes. ( non-admin closure) shoy ( reactions) 15:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Froebe helicopter
- Froebe helicopter ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable technological invention. KDS4444 Talk 07:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator KDS4444 Talk
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 09:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is "Canada's first helicopter" and historically notabile, as we can see from the Royal Aviation Museum of Western Canada here. However, it's also a copy and paste of that page and may well be deleted on that basis, if no one fixes it. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Strong keep. This is a notable aircraft - see for example the cites linking the Canadian Aviation Historical Society and the museum where it lives. The copyvio has now been written out. — Cheers,
Steelpillow (
Talk) 21:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- P.S. WP:SNOW — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 21:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Well, that was certainly my feeling, too, given the fact that we have reliable sources that indicated a historic place in Canadian aviation. But thanks to Steelpillow for doing the clean up. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom with no delete !votes. ( non-admin closure) shoy ( reactions) 15:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Froebe helicopter
- Froebe helicopter ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable technological invention. KDS4444 Talk 07:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator KDS4444 Talk
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 09:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is "Canada's first helicopter" and historically notabile, as we can see from the Royal Aviation Museum of Western Canada here. However, it's also a copy and paste of that page and may well be deleted on that basis, if no one fixes it. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Strong keep. This is a notable aircraft - see for example the cites linking the Canadian Aviation Historical Society and the museum where it lives. The copyvio has now been written out. — Cheers,
Steelpillow (
Talk) 21:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- P.S. WP:SNOW — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 21:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Well, that was certainly my feeling, too, given the fact that we have reliable sources that indicated a historic place in Canadian aviation. But thanks to Steelpillow for doing the clean up. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.