- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 01:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frith ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's just a dictionary entry and fails WP:NOT#DICT. I can't see any societal aspect that could serve as the basis of an article. White Whirlwind 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The article discusses the cultural aspects of the concept and this may be developed by reference to sources such as Development of the King's Peace and the English Local Peace Magistracy. Per our peaceful policy WP:ATD, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉( talk) 17:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. It is not a mere dictionary entry. The content of the article goes beyond that. And as highlighted by the editor above, if there is a possibility of improvements in the article, this should be done instead of exclusion WP:ATD. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 05:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 01:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frith ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's just a dictionary entry and fails WP:NOT#DICT. I can't see any societal aspect that could serve as the basis of an article. White Whirlwind 10:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The article discusses the cultural aspects of the concept and this may be developed by reference to sources such as Development of the King's Peace and the English Local Peace Magistracy. Per our peaceful policy WP:ATD, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉( talk) 17:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YorkshireLad ✿ (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. It is not a mere dictionary entry. The content of the article goes beyond that. And as highlighted by the editor above, if there is a possibility of improvements in the article, this should be done instead of exclusion WP:ATD. ✍A.WagnerC ( talk) 05:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.