The result was DABify. Clear consensus that this shouldn't exist as a stand-alone article, but options are all over as to what to do with it. I'm going to endorse the WP:DAB idea, on the assumption that those arguing for a merge would go along with this. It's not clear there's anything worth merging, but the existing text will still be available in the history if anybody wants it. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable uninhabited island. Asserted to have eagles nesting there, but sources only support existence. DePRODded as "Geographical features are notable", but WP:NGEO specifies that "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist.", and no such information has been shown to exist. NGEO advises "If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography.", but my earlier attempt to redirect to the (unsourced, possibly not even notable) article on Ellis Pond was reverted. Also something weird/unreliable about size as it's apparently a 3-acre island in a 1.43 acre pond! Pam D 15:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was DABify. Clear consensus that this shouldn't exist as a stand-alone article, but options are all over as to what to do with it. I'm going to endorse the WP:DAB idea, on the assumption that those arguing for a merge would go along with this. It's not clear there's anything worth merging, but the existing text will still be available in the history if anybody wants it. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable uninhabited island. Asserted to have eagles nesting there, but sources only support existence. DePRODded as "Geographical features are notable", but WP:NGEO specifies that "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist.", and no such information has been shown to exist. NGEO advises "If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography.", but my earlier attempt to redirect to the (unsourced, possibly not even notable) article on Ellis Pond was reverted. Also something weird/unreliable about size as it's apparently a 3-acre island in a 1.43 acre pond! Pam D 15:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)