From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Freewire

Freewire (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been re-nominated in hopes of coming to a consensus.
This article seems to lack notability seeing that no news sources have seeemingly reported on it in years. Also the website doesn't even exist so there isn't really a way for us to find out what has happened to it. Which could harm its factual accuracy. Furthermore this article could be confused by an American start-up also with the name Freewire technolgies. TheUSConservative ( talk) 23:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I was neutral in the earlier nomination, but absent any sources coming to light depicting this topic, but rather everything I found pointing to a different and unrelated company, deletion is in order. Jclemens ( talk) 19:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 03:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Freewire

Freewire (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been re-nominated in hopes of coming to a consensus.
This article seems to lack notability seeing that no news sources have seeemingly reported on it in years. Also the website doesn't even exist so there isn't really a way for us to find out what has happened to it. Which could harm its factual accuracy. Furthermore this article could be confused by an American start-up also with the name Freewire technolgies. TheUSConservative ( talk) 23:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I was neutral in the earlier nomination, but absent any sources coming to light depicting this topic, but rather everything I found pointing to a different and unrelated company, deletion is in order. Jclemens ( talk) 19:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 03:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook