This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 May 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 September 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Delete ---- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Two reasons. Either one is fatal. 1. Not notable according to wikipedia:biographies. There's been a non-notable notice on it from its beginning. There's no awards and no "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". If the information is right he's written a couple vanity press poetry books, and it seems he runs the vanity press. 2. No reliable sources for main text according to wikipedia:biographies of living people. All the information appears to be picked up from his personal website. All the external links are questionable sources. Ignore these are there isn't a reliable source in the article. This is dodging the policy. Wishtoremainanon ( talk) 12:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 May 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 September 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Delete ---- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Two reasons. Either one is fatal. 1. Not notable according to wikipedia:biographies. There's been a non-notable notice on it from its beginning. There's no awards and no "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". If the information is right he's written a couple vanity press poetry books, and it seems he runs the vanity press. 2. No reliable sources for main text according to wikipedia:biographies of living people. All the information appears to be picked up from his personal website. All the external links are questionable sources. Ignore these are there isn't a reliable source in the article. This is dodging the policy. Wishtoremainanon ( talk) 12:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply