- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Peter303x ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Frankenstein Girls Will Seem Strangely Sexy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frankenstein Girls Will Seem Strangely Sexy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found, except arguably this. All current sources are user generated content making much of the article essentially WP:OR. To be clear, I suggest a redirect to Mindless Self Indulgence. Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 23:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Redirect - to Mindless Self Indulgence. WP:NALBUM is not being met here. I was also only able to find that Vice article, which I've added. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 19:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - changing vote to reflect below information. Unfortunately I as well overlooked the reviews that were listed in the album ratings template, as they weren't initially listed as sources and did not appear in my search for other coverage. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 03:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mindless Self Indulgence, since the album itself is evidently not notable on its own. - The Gnome ( talk) 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - passes
WP:NALBUMS. Reviews in
AllMusic,
Rolling Stone,
Surf Mechanic,
Sputnik Music. There is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent. --
Ashley
yoursmile!
17:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @ Ashleyyoursmile: My bad, I didn't find those even though they were in the article. Thanks for bringing it up. I would withdraw the nomination, but according to this I can't due to others not voting Keep. I'll go ahead and turn the EL's to citations, and remove unreliable sources from the article then. Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 18:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - agreed that it passes WP:NALBUMS via significant coverage from music publications. NJZombie ( talk) 20:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Peter303x ( talk) 00:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Frankenstein Girls Will Seem Strangely Sexy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Frankenstein Girls Will Seem Strangely Sexy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found, except arguably this. All current sources are user generated content making much of the article essentially WP:OR. To be clear, I suggest a redirect to Mindless Self Indulgence. Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 23:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Redirect - to Mindless Self Indulgence. WP:NALBUM is not being met here. I was also only able to find that Vice article, which I've added. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 19:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - changing vote to reflect below information. Unfortunately I as well overlooked the reviews that were listed in the album ratings template, as they weren't initially listed as sources and did not appear in my search for other coverage. / Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 03:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Mindless Self Indulgence, since the album itself is evidently not notable on its own. - The Gnome ( talk) 16:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - passes
WP:NALBUMS. Reviews in
AllMusic,
Rolling Stone,
Surf Mechanic,
Sputnik Music. There is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent. --
Ashley
yoursmile!
17:09, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @ Ashleyyoursmile: My bad, I didn't find those even though they were in the article. Thanks for bringing it up. I would withdraw the nomination, but according to this I can't due to others not voting Keep. I'll go ahead and turn the EL's to citations, and remove unreliable sources from the article then. Mcguy15 ( talk, contribs) 18:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - agreed that it passes WP:NALBUMS via significant coverage from music publications. NJZombie ( talk) 20:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.