The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Current referencing does not meet
WP:GNG, and searches did not turn up anything not already used in the article, except for a single press release. Does not appear to meet either
WP:NARTIST or
WP:NACADEMIC either.
Onel5969TT me 20:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Neutral Someone added several references since the nomination. There do seem to be some book publicaitons and article, but they are all in Italian, so I cannnot assess them. Notability seems borderline if it exists.
104.163.140.193 (
talk) 01:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment I think there is a possible claim to notability for her work in sustainable printing techniques. She might satisfy
WP:ARTIST 2: The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. I don't read Italian well enough to find out more about her publications, unfortunately.
Mduvekot (
talk) 22:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. After looking into this more carefully, I realize Genna is one of Italy's most notable etchers. The sources now listed testify to her status but no doubt much more could be found.--
Ipigott (
talk) 16:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Current referencing does not meet
WP:GNG, and searches did not turn up anything not already used in the article, except for a single press release. Does not appear to meet either
WP:NARTIST or
WP:NACADEMIC either.
Onel5969TT me 20:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Neutral Someone added several references since the nomination. There do seem to be some book publicaitons and article, but they are all in Italian, so I cannnot assess them. Notability seems borderline if it exists.
104.163.140.193 (
talk) 01:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment I think there is a possible claim to notability for her work in sustainable printing techniques. She might satisfy
WP:ARTIST 2: The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. I don't read Italian well enough to find out more about her publications, unfortunately.
Mduvekot (
talk) 22:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. After looking into this more carefully, I realize Genna is one of Italy's most notable etchers. The sources now listed testify to her status but no doubt much more could be found.--
Ipigott (
talk) 16:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.