The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 02:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)reply
fails WP:ORG, the sources have been marked as questionable for many years now. coming "46th by Travel + Leisure's 2006 World's Best Top 100 Resorts Awards Readers " is hardly a claim for notability.
LibStar (
talk) 05:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:ORG. Just another run of the mill hotel franchise.
Ajf773 (
talk) 08:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
I would suggest that we find a target into which we can merge this. I am hesitant to straight-out delete, because we need to improve our coverage of Central America. Also, I am not seeing anything that makes this particular less notable than entries like the
Four Seasons Resort Carmelo, Uruguay or even the
Four Seasons Hotel Austin. That is not to say that it necessarily should be kept as is, but if it is not, it should be merged somewhere (perhaps they all should).
bd2412T 17:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Why do they need to be merged exactly? Those other hotel articles probably should be nominated for deletion as well.
Ajf773 (
talk) 18:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- 100% promo article, discussing the hotel's "Amenities" and nothing else. No sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The sources that come up are passing mentions and travel guides; fails
WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE. Separately, I nominated the Austin hotel for deletion too:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 02:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)reply
fails WP:ORG, the sources have been marked as questionable for many years now. coming "46th by Travel + Leisure's 2006 World's Best Top 100 Resorts Awards Readers " is hardly a claim for notability.
LibStar (
talk) 05:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:ORG. Just another run of the mill hotel franchise.
Ajf773 (
talk) 08:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
I would suggest that we find a target into which we can merge this. I am hesitant to straight-out delete, because we need to improve our coverage of Central America. Also, I am not seeing anything that makes this particular less notable than entries like the
Four Seasons Resort Carmelo, Uruguay or even the
Four Seasons Hotel Austin. That is not to say that it necessarily should be kept as is, but if it is not, it should be merged somewhere (perhaps they all should).
bd2412T 17:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Why do they need to be merged exactly? Those other hotel articles probably should be nominated for deletion as well.
Ajf773 (
talk) 18:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- 100% promo article, discussing the hotel's "Amenities" and nothing else. No sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The sources that come up are passing mentions and travel guides; fails
WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE. Separately, I nominated the Austin hotel for deletion too:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.