- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Forex Club ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Refs seem to consist of press releases and entries in databases, no in-depth coverage that’s independent of the topic. It was deleted from wp.ru for similar reasons, and if they can’t find evidence of its notability in its home country then it probably doesn’t exist. JohnBlackburne words deeds 19:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing at all comes close to actual substance, because the article only lists information wanting to clients and investors; the sources merely consist of PR or PR-like. SwisterTwister talk 22:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- strictly WP:PROMO and no indications of notability. The articles listed as competitors could also stand to undergo an AfD:
- K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - incredibly minor RSes (if "finance-magnates" even counts as one) are all it has. The rest of the sourcing is awful and irrelevant - David Gerard ( talk) 22:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Forex Club ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Refs seem to consist of press releases and entries in databases, no in-depth coverage that’s independent of the topic. It was deleted from wp.ru for similar reasons, and if they can’t find evidence of its notability in its home country then it probably doesn’t exist. JohnBlackburne words deeds 19:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing at all comes close to actual substance, because the article only lists information wanting to clients and investors; the sources merely consist of PR or PR-like. SwisterTwister talk 22:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- strictly WP:PROMO and no indications of notability. The articles listed as competitors could also stand to undergo an AfD:
- K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 21:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - incredibly minor RSes (if "finance-magnates" even counts as one) are all it has. The rest of the sourcing is awful and irrelevant - David Gerard ( talk) 22:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.