- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Flyrobe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable, by promotional editor. The refs are essentially PR, as the company has no significant accomplishments Two previous versions were deleted as G11--this isn;t bad enough for that. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete does not have sufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG, NCORP. Also, delete per WP:SOAP. See Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion number 4. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom; sources do not seem to have required depth of coverage. Eagleash ( talk) 00:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As promotional without enough sources supporting notability claim. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 19:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There is not enough here to warrant an entry. -- Q Chris ( talk) 09:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Flyrobe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable, by promotional editor. The refs are essentially PR, as the company has no significant accomplishments Two previous versions were deleted as G11--this isn;t bad enough for that. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete does not have sufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG, NCORP. Also, delete per WP:SOAP. See Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion number 4. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 18:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom; sources do not seem to have required depth of coverage. Eagleash ( talk) 00:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As promotional without enough sources supporting notability claim. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 19:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There is not enough here to warrant an entry. -- Q Chris ( talk) 09:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.