From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Southern Indoor Football League. ♠ PMC(talk) 01:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Florida Kings

Florida Kings (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with only one local independent source reporting anything, and it is all WP:NOTNEWS-style announcements. With no WP:SUSTAINED coverage due to only playing one away game, which would be a single WP:ROUTINE mention at best, this fails WP:NORG and WP:SPORTS presumptions of notability. Redirect would not be very helpful as the the only thing that links here is the league itself and its nav template, which this would redirect back to the league page. It is not substantially different than what was deleted before, just has two more sentences with the local cite. Absolutely no different than any other low-level non-media covered indoor football team (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Carolina Ravens, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Wild, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New England Cavalry, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savannah Coastal Outlaws, etc.). Yosemiter ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete My vote would be to merge the information onto the Southern Indoor Football League page. I've already copied over all relevant information, though, so we can safely delete (or redirect?) this article. SportingFlyer talk 23:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply
    • There is nothing particularly wrong with making it a redirect, it just wouldn't be used as far as I can tell. At best, it never gets used other than where I already mentioned it is linked (the league page where it would redirect and the nav template for the league). At worst, it could create a complication if there someday becomes another Florida Kings subject that needs the title space. Yosemiter ( talk) 01:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC) reply
      • I agree - just suggesting a redirect as a possibility. I don't think it's going to be anything anyone cares much about. SportingFlyer talk 01:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Southern Indoor Football League. Since the text of the article has been copied over to the linked page, we need to preserve the history of the current article for copyright purposes. More generally, I agree that this article does not meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Southern Indoor Football League. ♠ PMC(talk) 01:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Florida Kings

Florida Kings (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with only one local independent source reporting anything, and it is all WP:NOTNEWS-style announcements. With no WP:SUSTAINED coverage due to only playing one away game, which would be a single WP:ROUTINE mention at best, this fails WP:NORG and WP:SPORTS presumptions of notability. Redirect would not be very helpful as the the only thing that links here is the league itself and its nav template, which this would redirect back to the league page. It is not substantially different than what was deleted before, just has two more sentences with the local cite. Absolutely no different than any other low-level non-media covered indoor football team (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Carolina Ravens, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Wild, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New England Cavalry, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savannah Coastal Outlaws, etc.). Yosemiter ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete My vote would be to merge the information onto the Southern Indoor Football League page. I've already copied over all relevant information, though, so we can safely delete (or redirect?) this article. SportingFlyer talk 23:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply
    • There is nothing particularly wrong with making it a redirect, it just wouldn't be used as far as I can tell. At best, it never gets used other than where I already mentioned it is linked (the league page where it would redirect and the nav template for the league). At worst, it could create a complication if there someday becomes another Florida Kings subject that needs the title space. Yosemiter ( talk) 01:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC) reply
      • I agree - just suggesting a redirect as a possibility. I don't think it's going to be anything anyone cares much about. SportingFlyer talk 01:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Southern Indoor Football League. Since the text of the article has been copied over to the linked page, we need to preserve the history of the current article for copyright purposes. More generally, I agree that this article does not meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook