The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Non-trivial, notability asserting coverage exists. WilliamH ( talk) 17:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unreferenced one-liner about a software product with no assertion of its notability Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Don't delete without attempting to make a very small stub more worthy. This was an OS from a historically important vendor and the commercial experience of this OS illustrates the nature of the market. Microsoft was beginning to make its move toward OS dominance, along with Intel controlling the biggest chunk ofthe CPU market. It should be referenced in the articles having to do with the historical development of that market. ww ( talk) 01:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Non-trivial, notability asserting coverage exists. WilliamH ( talk) 17:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unreferenced one-liner about a software product with no assertion of its notability Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Don't delete without attempting to make a very small stub more worthy. This was an OS from a historically important vendor and the commercial experience of this OS illustrates the nature of the market. Microsoft was beginning to make its move toward OS dominance, along with Intel controlling the biggest chunk ofthe CPU market. It should be referenced in the articles having to do with the historical development of that market. ww ( talk) 01:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply