The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
This article appears to be original research. It originally had a {{ prod}} tag, but the creator removed it without actually improving the article (s/he explained the reasoning on the talk page, but it appears s/he doesn't understand WP:N). Google came up with no sources that "flambish" is related to the word "flam" or that it is a word at all, even in Norwegian. And when I Googled "flambish" and "flam" together, it came back with a single hit, which doesn't even mention the two words in the same context. In addition, the two apparent references in the article link to the same page, which doesn't mention "flambish" at all. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 17:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
This article appears to be original research. It originally had a {{ prod}} tag, but the creator removed it without actually improving the article (s/he explained the reasoning on the talk page, but it appears s/he doesn't understand WP:N). Google came up with no sources that "flambish" is related to the word "flam" or that it is a word at all, even in Norwegian. And when I Googled "flambish" and "flam" together, it came back with a single hit, which doesn't even mention the two words in the same context. In addition, the two apparent references in the article link to the same page, which doesn't mention "flambish" at all. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 17:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply