The result was hopelessly tainted by socking. hopelessly tainted by socking Spartaz Humbug! 20:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article is pure WP:OR and WP:POV. Reliable Sources exist, but do not back up what the Article claims they do. I have added various citation needed tags which have gone ignored. In addition, various Reliable Sources have been found(and added) which completely debunk the article's claims. Further, this may completely fail WP:N. The article has been deleted twice before. The first time the result was "no consensus". It was then (re)nominated, and survived, due to more votes for "Keep" than for "Delete". However, since Wikipedia is not a popularity contest, I have remoninated the Article, due to its lack of Sources which back up the claims, and its being made from whole cloth. Also, anyone checking Webster's, OED, or dictionary.com will discover that there is not, nor has ever been such a word as "Fingerpoke". The term is only used by ONE of the various Sources, Reliable or not. It is fairly popular with the Internet Wrestling Community though. Seeker of the Torch ( talk) 14:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC) reply
Extended dialogue with the sock of a banned user. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was hopelessly tainted by socking. hopelessly tainted by socking Spartaz Humbug! 20:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article is pure WP:OR and WP:POV. Reliable Sources exist, but do not back up what the Article claims they do. I have added various citation needed tags which have gone ignored. In addition, various Reliable Sources have been found(and added) which completely debunk the article's claims. Further, this may completely fail WP:N. The article has been deleted twice before. The first time the result was "no consensus". It was then (re)nominated, and survived, due to more votes for "Keep" than for "Delete". However, since Wikipedia is not a popularity contest, I have remoninated the Article, due to its lack of Sources which back up the claims, and its being made from whole cloth. Also, anyone checking Webster's, OED, or dictionary.com will discover that there is not, nor has ever been such a word as "Fingerpoke". The term is only used by ONE of the various Sources, Reliable or not. It is fairly popular with the Internet Wrestling Community though. Seeker of the Torch ( talk) 14:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC) reply
Extended dialogue with the sock of a banned user. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|