From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Spinning Spark 22:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Financial District, Boston

Financial District, Boston (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge This article repeats information found on other pages.

Speedy keep: pointless nomination by new user who has demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of the AfD process and what articles belong on Wikipedia. This is an article on a well-defined area of Boston. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A typical article about a notable city district, part of a series of Boston articles that organize the relevant information for the reader. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note. This AfD appears to be technically malformed since part of it is not currently showing up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 31.-- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note: I have fixed this AfD to give it the standard formatting. No opinion at this time, other than that I don't believe AfD is intended for merge nominations. (Mergers can be an outcome of an AfD, but there are ways to propose mergers without going through AfD.) -- WCQuidditch 21:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:18, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep: Per User:Pi.1415926535 and User:Arxiloxos, distinctive neighborhoods and areas of Boston have focused, distinctive articles; why dissolve those? I see nothing "broken" here, hence no need to fix it. Hertz1888 ( talk) 21:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Spinning Spark 22:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Financial District, Boston

Financial District, Boston (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge This article repeats information found on other pages.

Speedy keep: pointless nomination by new user who has demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of the AfD process and what articles belong on Wikipedia. This is an article on a well-defined area of Boston. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. A typical article about a notable city district, part of a series of Boston articles that organize the relevant information for the reader. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note. This AfD appears to be technically malformed since part of it is not currently showing up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 31.-- Arxiloxos ( talk) 21:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Note: I have fixed this AfD to give it the standard formatting. No opinion at this time, other than that I don't believe AfD is intended for merge nominations. (Mergers can be an outcome of an AfD, but there are ways to propose mergers without going through AfD.) -- WCQuidditch 21:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:18, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Speedy keep: Per User:Pi.1415926535 and User:Arxiloxos, distinctive neighborhoods and areas of Boston have focused, distinctive articles; why dissolve those? I see nothing "broken" here, hence no need to fix it. Hertz1888 ( talk) 21:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook