The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Euryalus (
talk) 13:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Zero evidence of notability, but A7 declined. DGG (
talk ) 04:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. No indication of notability, can find no secondary coverage of subject.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(
talk page) 13:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 14:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and I planned to comment sooner, there's still nothing actually convincing for its own substantial notability and I concur with the nominator's examinations.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Euryalus (
talk) 13:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Zero evidence of notability, but A7 declined. DGG (
talk ) 04:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. No indication of notability, can find no secondary coverage of subject.
Shearonink (
talk) 14:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(
talk page) 13:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 14:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and I planned to comment sooner, there's still nothing actually convincing for its own substantial notability and I concur with the nominator's examinations.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.