The result was keep, without prejudice to the merge discussion that has already opened. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete, claims notability but none shown in sourcing and should probably at most if kept be merged with overall parent corp, I believe this fails WP:ORG Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 01:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
YOU DON'T CONSIDER A HOTEL CHAIN WITH 61 HOTELS TO BE SIGNIFICANT? I linked to the website too - you can see the hotels there! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Anyway, I consider this discussion closed, so I'm going to delete the deletion notice now, unless anyone objects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
OK, so why does a hotel such as Embassy Suites have its own web page? They have about 200 locations. Even individual hotels have their own websites. I just can't believe such a major chain as Fiesta Inn does not have its own web page!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your support FreeRangeFrog! I guess a redirect would be OK - certainly preferable to a deletion. I'm trying to expand the Fiesta Inn article too. Larry Grossman ( talk) 02:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi, everyone - what do you think about the article now? Have I made enough improvements for a stand-alone article? If not, maybe could merge with Group Posadas as FreeRangeFrog suggested. I don't know how to merge articles though. Thanks. Larry Grossman ( talk) 18:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi, everyone - would it be OK if I remove the consideration for deletion notice now that I've updated the article? Thank you. Larry Grossman ( talk) 22:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I guess a better question is - would it be OK to close out this discussion now and consider that the consensus is for keeping the article now that I have made the requested improvements? Larry Grossman ( talk) 23:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This discussion has been open now for over two weeks. I believe I have made the requested improvements, so it seems like the consensus is to keep the article as a stand-alone as improved. I therefore intend to do a non-admin closure of this discussion soon and remove the notice in the article that the article is under consideration for deletion. Please let me know if you object to my doing a non-admin closure of this discussion at this time. Thank you. Larry Grossman ( talk) 12:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC) reply
* Delete, notability must be shown, but has not; no strong sourcing. Merging with parent is optional, though.
Editor400 (
talk) 22:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
I also disagree with Ravenwswing's assertion above that there is a clear consensus to merge. If you tabulate the above votes, there are more keeps than merge. Please note that Grupo Posadas recently sold off two of its brands, Caesar Park and Caesar Business, [1] which illustrates why brands should have their own articles, and I doubt almost anyone would have insisted that Grupo Posada's now defunct Mexicana should not have had it's own Wikipedia entry. Larry Grossman ( talk) 16:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, without prejudice to the merge discussion that has already opened. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete, claims notability but none shown in sourcing and should probably at most if kept be merged with overall parent corp, I believe this fails WP:ORG Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 01:13, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
YOU DON'T CONSIDER A HOTEL CHAIN WITH 61 HOTELS TO BE SIGNIFICANT? I linked to the website too - you can see the hotels there! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Anyway, I consider this discussion closed, so I'm going to delete the deletion notice now, unless anyone objects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
OK, so why does a hotel such as Embassy Suites have its own web page? They have about 200 locations. Even individual hotels have their own websites. I just can't believe such a major chain as Fiesta Inn does not have its own web page!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Grossman ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your support FreeRangeFrog! I guess a redirect would be OK - certainly preferable to a deletion. I'm trying to expand the Fiesta Inn article too. Larry Grossman ( talk) 02:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi, everyone - what do you think about the article now? Have I made enough improvements for a stand-alone article? If not, maybe could merge with Group Posadas as FreeRangeFrog suggested. I don't know how to merge articles though. Thanks. Larry Grossman ( talk) 18:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Hi, everyone - would it be OK if I remove the consideration for deletion notice now that I've updated the article? Thank you. Larry Grossman ( talk) 22:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I guess a better question is - would it be OK to close out this discussion now and consider that the consensus is for keeping the article now that I have made the requested improvements? Larry Grossman ( talk) 23:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This discussion has been open now for over two weeks. I believe I have made the requested improvements, so it seems like the consensus is to keep the article as a stand-alone as improved. I therefore intend to do a non-admin closure of this discussion soon and remove the notice in the article that the article is under consideration for deletion. Please let me know if you object to my doing a non-admin closure of this discussion at this time. Thank you. Larry Grossman ( talk) 12:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC) reply
* Delete, notability must be shown, but has not; no strong sourcing. Merging with parent is optional, though.
Editor400 (
talk) 22:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
I also disagree with Ravenwswing's assertion above that there is a clear consensus to merge. If you tabulate the above votes, there are more keeps than merge. Please note that Grupo Posadas recently sold off two of its brands, Caesar Park and Caesar Business, [1] which illustrates why brands should have their own articles, and I doubt almost anyone would have insisted that Grupo Posada's now defunct Mexicana should not have had it's own Wikipedia entry. Larry Grossman ( talk) 16:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC) reply