This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, which defaults to KEEP
Paul August☎ 22:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Completely arbitrary and pointless article. Even if we did want a list of Ugandan Field Marshals, this wouldn't be what the article would be called.
TreveXtalk 15:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Outlander, remember that this would mean retaining this article as a redirect to
Idi Amin. That would mean that anyone stumbling across the article would find themselves sent to
Idi Amin — more than slightly odd for someone expecting to find out about something else, don't you think? Plus, what would you merge that is not already there? -
Splash 18:06, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete, no redirect; possible Speedy under empty.
Owen×☎ 23:07, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, which defaults to KEEP
Paul August☎ 22:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Completely arbitrary and pointless article. Even if we did want a list of Ugandan Field Marshals, this wouldn't be what the article would be called.
TreveXtalk 15:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Outlander, remember that this would mean retaining this article as a redirect to
Idi Amin. That would mean that anyone stumbling across the article would find themselves sent to
Idi Amin — more than slightly odd for someone expecting to find out about something else, don't you think? Plus, what would you merge that is not already there? -
Splash 18:06, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete, no redirect; possible Speedy under empty.
Owen×☎ 23:07, 8 September 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.