The result was keep. There doesn't appear to be anyone arguing for deletion of these articles. Articles for Deletion is not the correct place to start discussions to merge articles. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC) reply
These articles below, along with the above, are nominated for the same reasons: they have not established notabilities, have been full of in-universes and empty of true perspectives, have not been referenced by sources, including third-party, and have been biographies of fictional characters of the cancelled soap
Sunset Beach. During the AfD, there should be no cut-and-paste edits and no redirects during the AfD span. Instead, wait until this discussion is closed. By the way, these articles may not stand alone as articles any longer: either redirect all to
List of Sunset Beach characters or delete all. --
Gh87 (
talk) 17:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Do you mean: Merge (or delete) all except
Olivia Richards,
Meg Cummings,
Bette Katzenkazrahi and
Annie Douglas Richards, which I have convinced myself to vote. Right now, I vote keep all except
Sara Cummings,
Caitlin Deschanel,
Vanessa Hart,
Gabi Martinez,, and
Maria Torres. The articles that I exempted fully support have become more superb and precise as other articles of British soap operas and their entities. And no... The British is NOT invading of American soaps and their entities. --
Gh87 (
talk) 03:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC) The articles that I have exempted (or italicized) have still not improved at this time, and my judgment is: they are not notable by many people, soap fans and casual viewers alike, and their articles have been overlooked to be improved for years. The current news do not cover these characters, and the news within the past ten years do not cover them at all (if not very much), especially outside soap-oriented periodicals. I'm very sure that the periodicals and books outside the primary sources, which would be of soap operas, at the time of near-cancellation covers only the soap opera and the portrayers, such as
Eddie Cibrian, but I must have overlooked. Currently, the exempted articles contain plots only and left out the real world perception: this may be against
what Wikipedia is not and should be not. These exempted fictional characters have potential to be notable; the reliable ones should be of the past because the current news, as mentioned previously, do not cover them after the cancellation of
Sunset Beach. --
Gh87 (
talk) 03:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. There doesn't appear to be anyone arguing for deletion of these articles. Articles for Deletion is not the correct place to start discussions to merge articles. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC) reply
These articles below, along with the above, are nominated for the same reasons: they have not established notabilities, have been full of in-universes and empty of true perspectives, have not been referenced by sources, including third-party, and have been biographies of fictional characters of the cancelled soap
Sunset Beach. During the AfD, there should be no cut-and-paste edits and no redirects during the AfD span. Instead, wait until this discussion is closed. By the way, these articles may not stand alone as articles any longer: either redirect all to
List of Sunset Beach characters or delete all. --
Gh87 (
talk) 17:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Do you mean: Merge (or delete) all except
Olivia Richards,
Meg Cummings,
Bette Katzenkazrahi and
Annie Douglas Richards, which I have convinced myself to vote. Right now, I vote keep all except
Sara Cummings,
Caitlin Deschanel,
Vanessa Hart,
Gabi Martinez,, and
Maria Torres. The articles that I exempted fully support have become more superb and precise as other articles of British soap operas and their entities. And no... The British is NOT invading of American soaps and their entities. --
Gh87 (
talk) 03:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC) The articles that I have exempted (or italicized) have still not improved at this time, and my judgment is: they are not notable by many people, soap fans and casual viewers alike, and their articles have been overlooked to be improved for years. The current news do not cover these characters, and the news within the past ten years do not cover them at all (if not very much), especially outside soap-oriented periodicals. I'm very sure that the periodicals and books outside the primary sources, which would be of soap operas, at the time of near-cancellation covers only the soap opera and the portrayers, such as
Eddie Cibrian, but I must have overlooked. Currently, the exempted articles contain plots only and left out the real world perception: this may be against
what Wikipedia is not and should be not. These exempted fictional characters have potential to be notable; the reliable ones should be of the past because the current news, as mentioned previously, do not cover them after the cancellation of
Sunset Beach. --
Gh87 (
talk) 03:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
reply