- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fetch My Guest
- Fetch My Guest ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional sounding overall. Im not Totally convinced. Pyrusca ( talk) 22:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I nearly speedy G11'd as this is so blatant, a literal advertisement with unsurprising advertising-only accounts involved, the overall and information are a classic example of making it first seem like a significant and notable article, but those "claims and information" are all thin and only exist as advertising. I'm surprised this is not an actual G12 since it certainly forms like one. Take the one worst part of all, they started the article at their own talk page before moving it themselves to mainspace, so it literally took the talk page format with them, this is a blatant advertisement and there's nothing at all suggesting otherwise. SwisterTwister talk 23:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- spam. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's blatantly promotional and could have been safely speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11. Deli nk ( talk) 20:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 02:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fetch My Guest
- Fetch My Guest ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional sounding overall. Im not Totally convinced. Pyrusca ( talk) 22:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as I nearly speedy G11'd as this is so blatant, a literal advertisement with unsurprising advertising-only accounts involved, the overall and information are a classic example of making it first seem like a significant and notable article, but those "claims and information" are all thin and only exist as advertising. I'm surprised this is not an actual G12 since it certainly forms like one. Take the one worst part of all, they started the article at their own talk page before moving it themselves to mainspace, so it literally took the talk page format with them, this is a blatant advertisement and there's nothing at all suggesting otherwise. SwisterTwister talk 23:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- spam. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's blatantly promotional and could have been safely speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11. Deli nk ( talk) 20:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.