The result was Redirect to California 37. Eluchil404 ( talk) 08:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NSONGThis article is a stub that should be deleted, as it is for a non notable, iTunes only single. In it's current state it is a list of technical information about the single and lacks any statement or prose as to it's notability and provides no information that could not be found via the album page. It's charting is a minor chart or statistic, if it were on a top chart, I would not have nominated it.
Addendum, I could easily see a redirect being appropriate. Newmanoconnor ( talk) 00:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
comment I would agree with the redirect rationale as well. Newmanoconnor ( talk) 19:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to California 37. Eluchil404 ( talk) 08:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NSONGThis article is a stub that should be deleted, as it is for a non notable, iTunes only single. In it's current state it is a list of technical information about the single and lacks any statement or prose as to it's notability and provides no information that could not be found via the album page. It's charting is a minor chart or statistic, if it were on a top chart, I would not have nominated it.
Addendum, I could easily see a redirect being appropriate. Newmanoconnor ( talk) 00:00, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply
comment I would agree with the redirect rationale as well. Newmanoconnor ( talk) 19:42, 29 April 2012 (UTC) reply