![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 April 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. (NB. This changed from "no consensus" following an appeal to my talkpage to review - in the cold light of day, this result better represents consensus) Fritzpoll ( talk) 22:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable piece of legislation. No sources provided that show notability. In-process label has been in place for weeks and no changes have been made recently aside from adjustments to the number of co-sponsors. A Google news search [1] for the term turns up nothing that establishes notability. Even if the bill were to pass, since the Federal Reserve is already audited regularly [2], so I can't see how a bill that forces another audit(?) would be notable. Burzmali ( talk) 18:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I accordingly request that the next administrator speedily close this AfD as "keep" under WP:DEL: Deletion discussions that are really unresolved content disputes may be closed by an administrator, and referred to the talk page or other appropriate forum. If this does not happen, I request that the admin ask me for further evidence of my charges. JJB 20:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC) JJB 21:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 April 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. (NB. This changed from "no consensus" following an appeal to my talkpage to review - in the cold light of day, this result better represents consensus) Fritzpoll ( talk) 22:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable piece of legislation. No sources provided that show notability. In-process label has been in place for weeks and no changes have been made recently aside from adjustments to the number of co-sponsors. A Google news search [1] for the term turns up nothing that establishes notability. Even if the bill were to pass, since the Federal Reserve is already audited regularly [2], so I can't see how a bill that forces another audit(?) would be notable. Burzmali ( talk) 18:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply
I accordingly request that the next administrator speedily close this AfD as "keep" under WP:DEL: Deletion discussions that are really unresolved content disputes may be closed by an administrator, and referred to the talk page or other appropriate forum. If this does not happen, I request that the admin ask me for further evidence of my charges. JJB 20:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC) JJB 21:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)