The result was redirect to San Jose del Monte#Barangays. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Latest discussion for barangay articles at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47#Are barangays notable? (can we please have a consensus now?) and the then-active Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarusan, retained the consensus that only barangays that are really notable by reliable sources are considered as worthy to have Wikipedia articles. In other words, barangay notability should be treated through case-to-case basis.
For this barangay, it is unsourced since March 2009, and no one attempted to improve this. It also has an unsourced (and potentially unencyclopedic) list of officials. Much of its information can be incorporated at San Jose del Monte instead. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to San Jose del Monte#Barangays. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Latest discussion for barangay articles at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47#Are barangays notable? (can we please have a consensus now?) and the then-active Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarusan, retained the consensus that only barangays that are really notable by reliable sources are considered as worthy to have Wikipedia articles. In other words, barangay notability should be treated through case-to-case basis.
For this barangay, it is unsourced since March 2009, and no one attempted to improve this. It also has an unsourced (and potentially unencyclopedic) list of officials. Much of its information can be incorporated at San Jose del Monte instead. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)