The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Only references provided are primary ones including a press release. And a Yahoo News article which appears to be based on a press release. Google news search on the title brings up zero hits, same with a book search. RadioFan ( talk) 14:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Several websites have information on this company like those that are listed on the references page; however this article just needs more information and some more research on. If this company exists, as it obviously does, I think it only needs more research. I vote keep it. JoJaEpp ( talk) 02:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Only references provided are primary ones including a press release. And a Yahoo News article which appears to be based on a press release. Google news search on the title brings up zero hits, same with a book search. RadioFan ( talk) 14:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Several websites have information on this company like those that are listed on the references page; however this article just needs more information and some more research on. If this company exists, as it obviously does, I think it only needs more research. I vote keep it. JoJaEpp ( talk) 02:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply