The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The term "Fancy Motorcycles" is not sourced, defined or commonly understood. It seems to be made up. Also, there are no sources to justify why particular models are included in the article. They appear to be added on the whim of the author. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:PRODUCT. Contested prod.
WWGB (
talk) 23:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Deleteper nomination.
Ajf773 (
talk) 07:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)reply
CommentLuxury vehicle would appear to cover this, although it's only about cars at present. There is a luxury segment of the motorcycle market documented in the media
[1][2][3][4][5], but "fancy motorcycles" is the wrong title and this article has problems, as already mentioned.
Colapeninsula (
talk) 10:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 01:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:OR and per
WP:NOTDIR. A hastily cobbled together (
cut and paste, without attribution) ill-defined list of motorcycle manufacturers. "Fancy Motorcycles" is not a common term either, in the same way a native English speaker wouldn't normally refer to
Luxury vehicles as "Fancy Cars". As a side note, the author has been blocked for copyright violations.
Fuebaey (
talk) 02:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The term "Fancy Motorcycles" is not sourced, defined or commonly understood. It seems to be made up. Also, there are no sources to justify why particular models are included in the article. They appear to be added on the whim of the author. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:PRODUCT. Contested prod.
WWGB (
talk) 23:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Deleteper nomination.
Ajf773 (
talk) 07:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)reply
CommentLuxury vehicle would appear to cover this, although it's only about cars at present. There is a luxury segment of the motorcycle market documented in the media
[1][2][3][4][5], but "fancy motorcycles" is the wrong title and this article has problems, as already mentioned.
Colapeninsula (
talk) 10:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 01:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:OR and per
WP:NOTDIR. A hastily cobbled together (
cut and paste, without attribution) ill-defined list of motorcycle manufacturers. "Fancy Motorcycles" is not a common term either, in the same way a native English speaker wouldn't normally refer to
Luxury vehicles as "Fancy Cars". As a side note, the author has been blocked for copyright violations.
Fuebaey (
talk) 02:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.