[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Family Constellations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It has been some time since I have seen an article so thin as this. An amalgamation of a lot of ideas of
Bert Hellinger who may be notable in his own right (edit: I decided that he is not notable either:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Hellinger) but this idea of his seems to have generated very little interest and notice beyond the typical "don't fall for scams" notes and some poorly-considered publications with basically no citations. If we were to remove all the
WP:CRUFT, we would be left with a simple statement that "Family Constellations is Bert Hellinger's attempt to do therapy." That's all that I can see sourced properly. Not suitable for Wikipedia.
jps (
talk)
22:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Philosophy,
Psychiatry,
Psychology, and
South Africa.
jps (
talk)
22:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, there has been some research evaluating the effectiveness of Family Constellation method, so I'd disagree with the statement that "this idea of his seems to have generated very little interest and notice".
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33528854/
- I do agree that the article needs a thorough re-working.
Zlmark (
talk)
16:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced that Family Process is a particularly good journal to establish notability. In particular, I note that the current EiC is a professor at a for-profit college Alliant International University and the stated goals of the institute that publishes the journal seem to be aligned more with resume padding at least in terms of rhetoric. Perhaps more troubling, the final author (usually the spot reserved for the PI) is heavily conflicted in producing this research [1] and that goes uncommented on in the paper. jps ( talk) 17:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Family Constellations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It has been some time since I have seen an article so thin as this. An amalgamation of a lot of ideas of
Bert Hellinger who may be notable in his own right (edit: I decided that he is not notable either:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Hellinger) but this idea of his seems to have generated very little interest and notice beyond the typical "don't fall for scams" notes and some poorly-considered publications with basically no citations. If we were to remove all the
WP:CRUFT, we would be left with a simple statement that "Family Constellations is Bert Hellinger's attempt to do therapy." That's all that I can see sourced properly. Not suitable for Wikipedia.
jps (
talk)
22:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Philosophy,
Psychiatry,
Psychology, and
South Africa.
jps (
talk)
22:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, there has been some research evaluating the effectiveness of Family Constellation method, so I'd disagree with the statement that "this idea of his seems to have generated very little interest and notice".
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33528854/
- I do agree that the article needs a thorough re-working.
Zlmark (
talk)
16:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced that Family Process is a particularly good journal to establish notability. In particular, I note that the current EiC is a professor at a for-profit college Alliant International University and the stated goals of the institute that publishes the journal seem to be aligned more with resume padding at least in terms of rhetoric. Perhaps more troubling, the final author (usually the spot reserved for the PI) is heavily conflicted in producing this research [1] and that goes uncommented on in the paper. jps ( talk) 17:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)