- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 15:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Falgun Rathod
- Falgun Rathod ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO. Sources are weaker than they first appear:
- The Hacker News doesn't appear reliable. (Not to be confused with Hacker News, although The Hacker News's favicon is obviously derivative, which is... sketchy.)
- Silicon India also doesn't appear reliable, and the mention is just a listicle.
- Pentest looks borderline to me, and may accept user submitted content. Regardless, the specific claim that he was the first Indian on the cover couldn't be verified.
- The India Today source is reliable, but it provides no specific information about Rathod at all. It lists him as one of several "famous personalities" in a profile of ethical hacking as an "offbeat career".
Grayfell ( talk) 23:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I had actually speedied this in April but it was removed with absolutely no explanations which is typical; examining this simply found nothing convincingly better at all. I frankly would've even PRODed sooner myself but I was not interested if it was simply going to be removed also....at least we have G4 now for the future. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable hacker. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW - there is not even an allegation of notability ("known"?!), much less real evidence of notability. Bearian ( talk) 21:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 15:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Falgun Rathod
- Falgun Rathod ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO. Sources are weaker than they first appear:
- The Hacker News doesn't appear reliable. (Not to be confused with Hacker News, although The Hacker News's favicon is obviously derivative, which is... sketchy.)
- Silicon India also doesn't appear reliable, and the mention is just a listicle.
- Pentest looks borderline to me, and may accept user submitted content. Regardless, the specific claim that he was the first Indian on the cover couldn't be verified.
- The India Today source is reliable, but it provides no specific information about Rathod at all. It lists him as one of several "famous personalities" in a profile of ethical hacking as an "offbeat career".
Grayfell ( talk) 23:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I had actually speedied this in April but it was removed with absolutely no explanations which is typical; examining this simply found nothing convincingly better at all. I frankly would've even PRODed sooner myself but I was not interested if it was simply going to be removed also....at least we have G4 now for the future. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable hacker. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW - there is not even an allegation of notability ("known"?!), much less real evidence of notability. Bearian ( talk) 21:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.