The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 02:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
No evidence has been presented that the church is notable, other than it being on SPLC's hit hate list. I don't think it is. Actions of a church member are not relevant unless there is some evidence the church encouraged or inspired them. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk) 00:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
Belchfire
-
TALK 00:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
reply— Cluetrainwoowoo ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Dori ☾ Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 02:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
No evidence has been presented that the church is notable, other than it being on SPLC's hit hate list. I don't think it is. Actions of a church member are not relevant unless there is some evidence the church encouraged or inspired them. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk) 00:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
Belchfire
-
TALK 00:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
reply— Cluetrainwoowoo ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.