- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Jasavina ( talk) 15:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fair Representation Act (United States)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fair Representation Act (United States) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks notoriety typical for an article. The sources have a vested interest in the subject, which itself is not compelling. Repeated death in committee should itself be evidence for the notoriety level. Jasavina ( talk) 02:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Politics. Jasavina ( talk) 02:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Independent of the subjects intrinsic lack of stature, I have attempted to find non-vested sources on the topic and failed. Jasavina ( talk) 02:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to
Ranked-choice voting in the United States. I agree that the bill itself does not necessarily need a standalone article because of its lack of progress, but I vehemently disagree with
your removal of any mention of this in the relevant main article and have undone that. A simple Google News search showed coverage in major sources including
The Atlantic,
the New York Times,
NPR,
Vox, and
the Washington Post. Others are
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]. Some of these being opinion pieces does not negate that it should be covered somewhere.
Reywas92
Talk
14:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll start a discussion concerning that other section on the relevant talk page.
- As for these source you found, thank you, I genuinely went looking and didn't find those. I'll recall the proposal for deletion. Jasavina ( talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Jasavina ( talk) 15:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fair Representation Act (United States)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fair Representation Act (United States) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks notoriety typical for an article. The sources have a vested interest in the subject, which itself is not compelling. Repeated death in committee should itself be evidence for the notoriety level. Jasavina ( talk) 02:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Politics. Jasavina ( talk) 02:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Independent of the subjects intrinsic lack of stature, I have attempted to find non-vested sources on the topic and failed. Jasavina ( talk) 02:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to
Ranked-choice voting in the United States. I agree that the bill itself does not necessarily need a standalone article because of its lack of progress, but I vehemently disagree with
your removal of any mention of this in the relevant main article and have undone that. A simple Google News search showed coverage in major sources including
The Atlantic,
the New York Times,
NPR,
Vox, and
the Washington Post. Others are
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]. Some of these being opinion pieces does not negate that it should be covered somewhere.
Reywas92
Talk
14:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll start a discussion concerning that other section on the relevant talk page.
- As for these source you found, thank you, I genuinely went looking and didn't find those. I'll recall the proposal for deletion. Jasavina ( talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.