- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Spam anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
FMB Insurance Services
- FMB Insurance Services ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's obviously written by the company. The user that created it is named FMB Insurance GabetheEditor ( talk cont) 13:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:COI concerns are valid, but that in itself isn't a reason for deletion. What is a valid reason is that I cannot find any evidence that this meets WP:COMPANY. The references given are either the company's own website or company-authored PR fluff. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 14:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Spam anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
FMB Insurance Services
- FMB Insurance Services ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's obviously written by the company. The user that created it is named FMB Insurance GabetheEditor ( talk cont) 13:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:COI concerns are valid, but that in itself isn't a reason for deletion. What is a valid reason is that I cannot find any evidence that this meets WP:COMPANY. The references given are either the company's own website or company-authored PR fluff. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 14:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.