From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions do not properly address the WP:GNG argument for deletion; they do not provide reliable sources that provide substantial coverage of this vehicle (and no, a model is not such coverage because it is not information). Sandstein 09:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC) reply

FBW Dreiachskipper Type 80-N (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:GNG. Only one vehicle ever built. The Banner  talk 22:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Banner  talk 22:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 11:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply

BTW: you can buy a diecast-model of the civilian FBW 80N [2]. So GNG is out of question. Nüedi ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Fails GNG. Sources in the article, in above discussion, and found in BEFORE do not have SIGCOV. Mentions do not show notability, just because something existed, does not make it notabile.
Source evaluation table:
Source Evaluation
Nüssli AG FBW 80N E6A… Single paragraph on the site of the civilan manufacturer. Not SIGCOV
W 80-N 6x4 on Militär Motorfahrer Verein… A photo on a blog with unsourced statistics. Not SIGCOV.
tps://www.spielland.ch/952_200507/fahrze… Page for a toy model, no information, not SIGCOV
Just because something existed does not make it notable.  //  Timothy ::  t |  c |  a   03:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions do not properly address the WP:GNG argument for deletion; they do not provide reliable sources that provide substantial coverage of this vehicle (and no, a model is not such coverage because it is not information). Sandstein 09:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC) reply

FBW Dreiachskipper Type 80-N (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail WP:GNG. Only one vehicle ever built. The Banner  talk 22:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Banner  talk 22:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 11:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) reply

BTW: you can buy a diecast-model of the civilian FBW 80N [2]. So GNG is out of question. Nüedi ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: Fails GNG. Sources in the article, in above discussion, and found in BEFORE do not have SIGCOV. Mentions do not show notability, just because something existed, does not make it notabile.
Source evaluation table:
Source Evaluation
Nüssli AG FBW 80N E6A… Single paragraph on the site of the civilan manufacturer. Not SIGCOV
W 80-N 6x4 on Militär Motorfahrer Verein… A photo on a blog with unsourced statistics. Not SIGCOV.
tps://www.spielland.ch/952_200507/fahrze… Page for a toy model, no information, not SIGCOV
Just because something existed does not make it notable.  //  Timothy ::  t |  c |  a   03:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook