- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
FAVS Stradivari
- FAVS Stradivari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable firearm; no reliable secondary sources found, although an Italian speaker may have more luck. Created by User:Ctway sock, who was known to include false information and copyvios. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
DELETE... Simply does not meet General Notability Guidelines...This appears to be a semi-custom specialty rifle made in small numbers and available for sale only in Italy.-- RAF910 ( talk) 20:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- non notable + created by a sock. BTW, if it was created by a sock in avoiding a ban, this would qualify for speedy deletion, no? Pls see
Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G5. Hope this helps!
K.e.coffman (
talk) 03:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, technically he created the vast majority of these articles before we discovered the sockfarm (unless he's really Jetwave Dave from like 2006, but we can't prove that), so they can't be G5'd. Also, I prefer to bring them to AfD, because sometimes people find sources for them that I overlook or can't access (e.g. paper books); I do find these articles fascinating and would prefer them to stay, but policy doesn't agree with me. ansh 666 06:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
FAVS Stradivari
- FAVS Stradivari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable firearm; no reliable secondary sources found, although an Italian speaker may have more luck. Created by User:Ctway sock, who was known to include false information and copyvios. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 02:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
DELETE... Simply does not meet General Notability Guidelines...This appears to be a semi-custom specialty rifle made in small numbers and available for sale only in Italy.-- RAF910 ( talk) 20:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- non notable + created by a sock. BTW, if it was created by a sock in avoiding a ban, this would qualify for speedy deletion, no? Pls see
Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G5. Hope this helps!
K.e.coffman (
talk) 03:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well, technically he created the vast majority of these articles before we discovered the sockfarm (unless he's really Jetwave Dave from like 2006, but we can't prove that), so they can't be G5'd. Also, I prefer to bring them to AfD, because sometimes people find sources for them that I overlook or can't access (e.g. paper books); I do find these articles fascinating and would prefer them to stay, but policy doesn't agree with me. ansh 666 06:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.