The result was no consensus. -- Core desat 05:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Article describes in intimate detail a fictional suit appearing in a comic. Not notable. Perhaps of interest within an anime wiki, but not wikipedia
Oscarthecat 20:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
:Suggest that the following related and similar articles have similar consideration for deletion.
:NOTE: These articles are not part of the nomination, and not under discussion. This is only about
F90 Gundam Formula 90. --
Eyrian 20:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
Speedy Keep Extremely bad faith nom. Has mass-nominated several Gundam articles with almost the exact same text for the reason, and has obviously not read any of them. Furthermore, in the case of this particular AfD, it's obvious the user in question has not even LOOKED at most of the article listed-- only the initial one has an AfD tag, and well-written, well-sourced articles such as Gundam (mobile suit) are listed that clearly meet noteability standards. Jtrainor 20:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
By the way, with regards to this particular article, it and the F-91 article need to be merged into the Formula Project article, which has needed a re-write for some time by someone knowledgeable on the subject (it involves an anime, a manga series, and a whole mess of model kits). Jtrainor 21:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
(to Eyrian)You arn't the nom, so I really don't think it's your place to say what this AfD covers and what it does not. Jtrainor 20:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. -- Core desat 05:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Article describes in intimate detail a fictional suit appearing in a comic. Not notable. Perhaps of interest within an anime wiki, but not wikipedia
Oscarthecat 20:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
:Suggest that the following related and similar articles have similar consideration for deletion.
:NOTE: These articles are not part of the nomination, and not under discussion. This is only about
F90 Gundam Formula 90. --
Eyrian 20:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
Speedy Keep Extremely bad faith nom. Has mass-nominated several Gundam articles with almost the exact same text for the reason, and has obviously not read any of them. Furthermore, in the case of this particular AfD, it's obvious the user in question has not even LOOKED at most of the article listed-- only the initial one has an AfD tag, and well-written, well-sourced articles such as Gundam (mobile suit) are listed that clearly meet noteability standards. Jtrainor 20:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
By the way, with regards to this particular article, it and the F-91 article need to be merged into the Formula Project article, which has needed a re-write for some time by someone knowledgeable on the subject (it involves an anime, a manga series, and a whole mess of model kits). Jtrainor 21:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply
(to Eyrian)You arn't the nom, so I really don't think it's your place to say what this AfD covers and what it does not. Jtrainor 20:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC) reply