The result of the debate was speedily deleted per CSD G4. Mushroom 02:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web forum/game. Fails WP:WEB (see also the Talk page). Keeps being recreated, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expansion Fleet. Delete. Kusma (討論) 13:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
keep The discussion page of the article on Expansion Fleet clearly lists various arguments why this nomination for deletion is not only invalid, but also why it is notable enough. Attempts of Deletionists discourage various contributors to Wikipedia, and therefore are not complying to user regulations of Wikipedia whereby their votes should weigh in this vote to a minority only. Aneirin 14:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
http://www.gamewyrd.com/others/cyber517
http://gamiespelen.eigenstart.nl/
http://www.mountsutro.org/index.php/linkage/
http://elindelwolf.iblogs.com/
http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-17955.html
Awards that Expansion Fleet received:
http://www.trekconnection.com/awards/tcaward.asp
http://www.jupiter-station.com/JuPAwardBanners05.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/me4/jaddziadax/page11.html
More awards Expansion Fleet received can be seen on the website itself:
http://www.expansionfleet.com/cgi-bin/fleet/ikonboard.cgi?act=Page;p=ewards
Additionally, there is the Expansion Fleet online store:
http://shop.expansionfleet.com/shop.php
www.cafepress.com/expansion
And also additionally, Expansion Fleet is linked to the IRC server mystical.net (through expansion.mystical.net):
http://www.expansionfleet.com/cgi-bin/fleet/ikonboard.cgi?act=Page;p=irc
Those who voted delete for non notable hereby are proven that they only voted on the basis of "I'm too lazy to investigate myself so I'll vote delete because I never heard of it". Notability is a POV argument and therefore invalid. Aneirin 16:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
How "free" is this encyclopedia anyway? 81.233.40.57 17:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP To delve into it being questioned as notable or not, if it has not been added or known, this site has 2 books published about it, one 360 pages, the most recent 546 pages. Other than that, what is such the problem with keeping Expansion up? One would think there are better things to do with time. Users submit the knowledge to share existing things with the world. I look now and see The Free Encyclopedia. Let Expansion Fleet be free information to the world. - Tom Hobson
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
208.34.232.27 (
talk •
contribs) .
KEEP Keep this Article. Expansion Fleet is a good and very famous role playing community and it deserves to be here.
Keep this Please. Expansion Fleet is amazing.
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
81.77.92.95 (
talk •
contribs) .
Books [www.cafepress.com/expansion Expansion Yearbook 2] [www.cafepress.com/expansion2 Expansion Yearbook 1]-Tom Hobson
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
208.34.232.27 (
talk •
contribs) .
Delete, non-notable per WP:WEB. Clearly the site is well-loved by a few, but this is a general-use encyclopedia. -- Dragonfiend 18:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The article of Expansion Fleet on Wikipedia.org is currently under a hot debate to be deleted. Some "Deletionist" Admins of Wikipedia claim it is "non notable" because they personally don't know it, and attempt to delete it repeatingly at what obviously appears to be a personal attack on anything that doesn't float their boat.
Please help ups keep the article on Wikipedia, by voting "keep" at this URL:
You can do so by going to the URL above, clicking "Edit this page" and then adding (at the bottom of the already posted text) the following line:
'''keep''' any comments here ~~~~
And click "save page" on the bottom.
This needs to be done ASAP if we are to crush the corrupt abuse of the Wikipedia policies by its admins.
Please also consider signing our petition against Wikipedia corruption:
[www.petitiononline.com/wikiped/petition.html]
Thank you for your support!
After various deletion attempts, Wikipedia deletionist admins have attempted to discredit this website in various ways.
Expansion Fleet has hereby withdrawn its article, no longer wishing to be connected with the website wikipedia.org and deeming the censored encyclopedia to be unworthy of an Expansion Fleet article.
On the other hand, we encourage everyone to help us bring a halt to the corruption of the Wikipedia Deletionist Admins who intend to delete any article that they personally never heard about (proves they didn't hear about much in the world). We discourage anyone to contribute any information, images or other things to the Wikipedia.org encyclopedia.
Therefore, we ask everyone to sign our petition to bring this corruption to the attention of Wikipedia:
[www.petitiononline.com/wikiped/petition.html]
Thank you for your support!
Sycthos Talk 19:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Vorak is the only owner of the site I think. So him saying for it to be deleted probally means it should be deleted. He said he withdrew any allowing of Expansion to be on this place. Realizing that at the time probally would save picking it with the rules to take it off, that its no longer wanted to be on this place.
keep
67.68.222.46
01:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
"'Keep"' This is a General use online encyclopedia, this is true, so are you going to try and delete everything from it that hasn`t been widely heard of? This article, simply by being here and through this discussion is, albeit slowly, giving the site exposure to outsiders. So all of those who are in favor of deletion and give this link to thier friends are doing nothing but promoting the site, the oppinion of the poster notwithstanding, they are still viewing the link and taking in the name, there is no reason to delete the site. Perhaps rather than simply try to abolish it you should look at it and then form an oppinion. 71.97.190.106 02:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
keepwhy should this be deleted its a cool fourm nthing wrong with it, If it's deleted thats a hate crime! 66.58.187.131 06:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedily deleted per CSD G4. Mushroom 02:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web forum/game. Fails WP:WEB (see also the Talk page). Keeps being recreated, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expansion Fleet. Delete. Kusma (討論) 13:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
keep The discussion page of the article on Expansion Fleet clearly lists various arguments why this nomination for deletion is not only invalid, but also why it is notable enough. Attempts of Deletionists discourage various contributors to Wikipedia, and therefore are not complying to user regulations of Wikipedia whereby their votes should weigh in this vote to a minority only. Aneirin 14:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
http://www.gamewyrd.com/others/cyber517
http://gamiespelen.eigenstart.nl/
http://www.mountsutro.org/index.php/linkage/
http://elindelwolf.iblogs.com/
http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-17955.html
Awards that Expansion Fleet received:
http://www.trekconnection.com/awards/tcaward.asp
http://www.jupiter-station.com/JuPAwardBanners05.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/me4/jaddziadax/page11.html
More awards Expansion Fleet received can be seen on the website itself:
http://www.expansionfleet.com/cgi-bin/fleet/ikonboard.cgi?act=Page;p=ewards
Additionally, there is the Expansion Fleet online store:
http://shop.expansionfleet.com/shop.php
www.cafepress.com/expansion
And also additionally, Expansion Fleet is linked to the IRC server mystical.net (through expansion.mystical.net):
http://www.expansionfleet.com/cgi-bin/fleet/ikonboard.cgi?act=Page;p=irc
Those who voted delete for non notable hereby are proven that they only voted on the basis of "I'm too lazy to investigate myself so I'll vote delete because I never heard of it". Notability is a POV argument and therefore invalid. Aneirin 16:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
How "free" is this encyclopedia anyway? 81.233.40.57 17:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP To delve into it being questioned as notable or not, if it has not been added or known, this site has 2 books published about it, one 360 pages, the most recent 546 pages. Other than that, what is such the problem with keeping Expansion up? One would think there are better things to do with time. Users submit the knowledge to share existing things with the world. I look now and see The Free Encyclopedia. Let Expansion Fleet be free information to the world. - Tom Hobson
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
208.34.232.27 (
talk •
contribs) .
KEEP Keep this Article. Expansion Fleet is a good and very famous role playing community and it deserves to be here.
Keep this Please. Expansion Fleet is amazing.
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
81.77.92.95 (
talk •
contribs) .
Books [www.cafepress.com/expansion Expansion Yearbook 2] [www.cafepress.com/expansion2 Expansion Yearbook 1]-Tom Hobson
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
208.34.232.27 (
talk •
contribs) .
Delete, non-notable per WP:WEB. Clearly the site is well-loved by a few, but this is a general-use encyclopedia. -- Dragonfiend 18:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The article of Expansion Fleet on Wikipedia.org is currently under a hot debate to be deleted. Some "Deletionist" Admins of Wikipedia claim it is "non notable" because they personally don't know it, and attempt to delete it repeatingly at what obviously appears to be a personal attack on anything that doesn't float their boat.
Please help ups keep the article on Wikipedia, by voting "keep" at this URL:
You can do so by going to the URL above, clicking "Edit this page" and then adding (at the bottom of the already posted text) the following line:
'''keep''' any comments here ~~~~
And click "save page" on the bottom.
This needs to be done ASAP if we are to crush the corrupt abuse of the Wikipedia policies by its admins.
Please also consider signing our petition against Wikipedia corruption:
[www.petitiononline.com/wikiped/petition.html]
Thank you for your support!
After various deletion attempts, Wikipedia deletionist admins have attempted to discredit this website in various ways.
Expansion Fleet has hereby withdrawn its article, no longer wishing to be connected with the website wikipedia.org and deeming the censored encyclopedia to be unworthy of an Expansion Fleet article.
On the other hand, we encourage everyone to help us bring a halt to the corruption of the Wikipedia Deletionist Admins who intend to delete any article that they personally never heard about (proves they didn't hear about much in the world). We discourage anyone to contribute any information, images or other things to the Wikipedia.org encyclopedia.
Therefore, we ask everyone to sign our petition to bring this corruption to the attention of Wikipedia:
[www.petitiononline.com/wikiped/petition.html]
Thank you for your support!
Sycthos Talk 19:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Vorak is the only owner of the site I think. So him saying for it to be deleted probally means it should be deleted. He said he withdrew any allowing of Expansion to be on this place. Realizing that at the time probally would save picking it with the rules to take it off, that its no longer wanted to be on this place.
keep
67.68.222.46
01:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
"'Keep"' This is a General use online encyclopedia, this is true, so are you going to try and delete everything from it that hasn`t been widely heard of? This article, simply by being here and through this discussion is, albeit slowly, giving the site exposure to outsiders. So all of those who are in favor of deletion and give this link to thier friends are doing nothing but promoting the site, the oppinion of the poster notwithstanding, they are still viewing the link and taking in the name, there is no reason to delete the site. Perhaps rather than simply try to abolish it you should look at it and then form an oppinion. 71.97.190.106 02:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply
keepwhy should this be deleted its a cool fourm nthing wrong with it, If it's deleted thats a hate crime! 66.58.187.131 06:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC) reply