The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ 21 06:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply
1) The entire article is written like a blog post or a column. The style is very informal is inappropriate an encyclopedia article.
2) The article is unorganized and lacks most if not all of the features seen in other Wikipedia articles about books.
3) The article is much too long and most of the content has nothing to do with the book itself.
4) The article is written almost entirely by one Wikipedia member, J. Johnson and contains original research/commentary.
5) The book is not notable enough to deserve its own article.
Minor stylistic copyediting will not suffice to save this article; the entire article should be deleted and, if deemed necessary, rewritten from scratch.
Trialeditor (
talk) 16:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ 21 06:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply
1) The entire article is written like a blog post or a column. The style is very informal is inappropriate an encyclopedia article.
2) The article is unorganized and lacks most if not all of the features seen in other Wikipedia articles about books.
3) The article is much too long and most of the content has nothing to do with the book itself.
4) The article is written almost entirely by one Wikipedia member, J. Johnson and contains original research/commentary.
5) The book is not notable enough to deserve its own article.
Minor stylistic copyediting will not suffice to save this article; the entire article should be deleted and, if deemed necessary, rewritten from scratch.
Trialeditor (
talk) 16:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
reply