From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Everything Nice (EP)

Everything Nice (EP) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. I'm not entirely sure on what sorts of reviews are considered notable/RS in this genre, but it appears to satisfy the "cannot grow beyond a stub" rule of thumb. Fermiboson ( talk) 23:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Pitchfork is one of the largest and most reputable currently active music review websites. BrooklynVegan is also long-established and notable enough to have its own Wikipedia page. Wisestwol ( talk) 23:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep: Adding also reviews from other established publications New Noise Magazine and Stereogum. I believe the release is notable as it served as a breakthrough for the band and led to them being signed to the label Wax Bodega, which in turn led to a reissuing of the EP on vinyl. The success of this EP also enabled the band to join sold-out tours across Canada, the USA, UK and Europe and has so far garnered over 4 million streams on Spotify. Wisestwol ( talk) 00:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep: The Stereogum and BrooklynVegan pieces are a bit too short to really count, but Pitchfork and New Noise are plenty on their own. It's not much -- only just barely above a stub at the moment, and relying entirely on primary sources for the non-review sections -- but for our purposes, it's enough to pass on notability. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 17:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Everything Nice (EP)

Everything Nice (EP) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. I'm not entirely sure on what sorts of reviews are considered notable/RS in this genre, but it appears to satisfy the "cannot grow beyond a stub" rule of thumb. Fermiboson ( talk) 23:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Pitchfork is one of the largest and most reputable currently active music review websites. BrooklynVegan is also long-established and notable enough to have its own Wikipedia page. Wisestwol ( talk) 23:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep: Adding also reviews from other established publications New Noise Magazine and Stereogum. I believe the release is notable as it served as a breakthrough for the band and led to them being signed to the label Wax Bodega, which in turn led to a reissuing of the EP on vinyl. The success of this EP also enabled the band to join sold-out tours across Canada, the USA, UK and Europe and has so far garnered over 4 million streams on Spotify. Wisestwol ( talk) 00:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep: The Stereogum and BrooklynVegan pieces are a bit too short to really count, but Pitchfork and New Noise are plenty on their own. It's not much -- only just barely above a stub at the moment, and relying entirely on primary sources for the non-review sections -- but for our purposes, it's enough to pass on notability. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 17:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook