- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Every time you masturbate... God kills a kitten ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia this is no educational article and it would not even be considered relevant or notable according to any of wikipedia’s rules Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable meme Seasider91 ( talk) 18:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic piece about an ephemeral meme. Carrite ( talk) 17:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merge into the list of Internet memes or weak delete. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 01:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep/Note This is the 4th time this article has had to go through AfD... just how many times does an article have to be kept for another user to not put it up for deletion again? Also, it's a meme, and there's precedent for memes deserving their own article so I don't know how the deletion of this article could be justified off of the reasoning that "this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia" Soulbust ( talk) 06:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- I cleaned it up a bit, added references, and tweaked the article's text so hopefully that helps. Soulbust ( talk) 07:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per recent improvements. Artw ( talk) 15:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Eeesh. Quite aside from that the nom's failed to articulate a valid deletion ground, a meme notorious enough not merely to be cited in reliable media sources, but parodied in reliable media sources meets the GNG by any sane measure. Ravenswing 00:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. 1. The nominator failed to state a valid deletion ground. 2. This is the FOURTH nomination of this dimwitted article. We need a double jeopardy rule at WP:AFD. Barring an article turning out to be fraudulent or the AfD process having been sockpuppeted or meatpuppeted, repeat nominations for deletion start to sound like WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 12:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) B E C K Y S A Y L E S 02:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Every time you masturbate... God kills a kitten ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia this is no educational article and it would not even be considered relevant or notable according to any of wikipedia’s rules Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable meme Seasider91 ( talk) 18:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Unencyclopedic piece about an ephemeral meme. Carrite ( talk) 17:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merge into the list of Internet memes or weak delete. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 01:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep/Note This is the 4th time this article has had to go through AfD... just how many times does an article have to be kept for another user to not put it up for deletion again? Also, it's a meme, and there's precedent for memes deserving their own article so I don't know how the deletion of this article could be justified off of the reasoning that "this article is a complete joke and has no place on wikipedia" Soulbust ( talk) 06:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- I cleaned it up a bit, added references, and tweaked the article's text so hopefully that helps. Soulbust ( talk) 07:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per recent improvements. Artw ( talk) 15:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Eeesh. Quite aside from that the nom's failed to articulate a valid deletion ground, a meme notorious enough not merely to be cited in reliable media sources, but parodied in reliable media sources meets the GNG by any sane measure. Ravenswing 00:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. 1. The nominator failed to state a valid deletion ground. 2. This is the FOURTH nomination of this dimwitted article. We need a double jeopardy rule at WP:AFD. Barring an article turning out to be fraudulent or the AfD process having been sockpuppeted or meatpuppeted, repeat nominations for deletion start to sound like WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 12:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.