The result was merge to IBM Series/1. I handled the merge to the IBM Series/1 article JodyB talk 21:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this programming language is notable. Wikipedia is not a directory of programming languages. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
@ all the above: The merge tag was added after I nominated it for deletion [1], the nearest major university is 250 miles from where I live so I can't just pop over there and look this up, and simply claiming something is automatically or "undoubtedly" notable doesn't actually prove anything. If I look around I could also find an instruction manual for the specific model of chain saw I use, and without even going to a university at that, that doesn't prove anything as far as establishing notability. The new sources look pretty weak, especially the one identified as "unknown article." Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to IBM Series/1. I handled the merge to the IBM Series/1 article JodyB talk 21:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this programming language is notable. Wikipedia is not a directory of programming languages. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply
@ all the above: The merge tag was added after I nominated it for deletion [1], the nearest major university is 250 miles from where I live so I can't just pop over there and look this up, and simply claiming something is automatically or "undoubtedly" notable doesn't actually prove anything. If I look around I could also find an instruction manual for the specific model of chain saw I use, and without even going to a university at that, that doesn't prove anything as far as establishing notability. The new sources look pretty weak, especially the one identified as "unknown article." Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply