- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Nepal
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Nepal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no independent reliable sources providing significant coverage. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Nepal. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: The news Pastor Ordination in Asha Church, published by NepalChurch.org, a news site about Christianity in Nepal is indeed an independent and reliable source providing coverage significant. The same can be said about the article on the website Poilnam and WordandDeed. Sources do not need to be entirely independent of Christianity to present independent coverage of a Christian topic. The sources present in the article evidence the notability quickly and clearly. The reliability of at least two sources is good. Daniel Silva Mendanha ( talk) 20:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Femke ( talk) 16:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not a single independent and reliable source. Fails Notability. ~ Yeti Dai ( talk) 19:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Can't find independent significant coverage to establish WP:N. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not enough coverage and is not notable. DIVINE ( talk) 17:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Nepal
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Nepal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no independent reliable sources providing significant coverage. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Nepal. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: The news Pastor Ordination in Asha Church, published by NepalChurch.org, a news site about Christianity in Nepal is indeed an independent and reliable source providing coverage significant. The same can be said about the article on the website Poilnam and WordandDeed. Sources do not need to be entirely independent of Christianity to present independent coverage of a Christian topic. The sources present in the article evidence the notability quickly and clearly. The reliability of at least two sources is good. Daniel Silva Mendanha ( talk) 20:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Femke ( talk) 16:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not a single independent and reliable source. Fails Notability. ~ Yeti Dai ( talk) 19:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Can't find independent significant coverage to establish WP:N. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Not enough coverage and is not notable. DIVINE ( talk) 17:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.