- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
European Society for Computing and Technology in Anesthesia and Intensive Care
- European Society for Computing and Technology in Anesthesia and Intensive Care ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. There seems to be no independent coverage of this organization. Yes, they sponsor meetings, and yes, papers from those meetings are published in the proceedings, but no one has written anything about the organization itself. Note that most coverage spells "Anesthesia" in the British manner, as "Anaesthesia," so this should be taken into account when searching for sources. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 19:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 18:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete could not find coverage outside medical articles, needs some mainstream coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar ( talk) 10:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 00:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
European Society for Computing and Technology in Anesthesia and Intensive Care
- European Society for Computing and Technology in Anesthesia and Intensive Care ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. There seems to be no independent coverage of this organization. Yes, they sponsor meetings, and yes, papers from those meetings are published in the proceedings, but no one has written anything about the organization itself. Note that most coverage spells "Anesthesia" in the British manner, as "Anaesthesia," so this should be taken into account when searching for sources. — alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 19:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 18:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete could not find coverage outside medical articles, needs some mainstream coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar ( talk) 10:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.